Skip to content

Give organizers a clearer view of campaign standing.

Rankings help authorized organizers review candidate standing and verified campaign activity inside the event context. They are an operational view of campaign results where supported—not a judge-scoring system, official tabulation service, or substitute for the event’s own rules.

Primary CTA: Request a Demo

Features

Review candidate standing:

See how eligible candidates are positioned within the selected campaign or event context.

Use verified vote activity:

Ground ranking totals in the vote records that have passed the applicable campaign and payment or verification checks.

Keep internal visibility controlled:

Give authorized users access to operational totals even when public vote-count visibility is limited.

Make campaign context explicit:

Keep the event, campaign state, candidate, and relevant time context visible alongside the standing.

Distinguish ranking from judging:

Present campaign activity and verified results without implying judge scores, official tabulation, or a broader competition result.

Benefits

Help directors monitor campaign progress from one operational view.
Make candidate standing easier to review without maintaining parallel manual lists.
Give staff a shared, event-specific reference for campaign activity and follow-up.
Support clearer decisions about what result information should be shared publicly.

Ranking review workflow

Select the organization, event, and campaign context to review.
Confirm the campaign state and the candidate set included in the ranking.
Review candidate standing alongside the available verified vote totals and relevant timestamps.
Check whether public vote-count visibility and leaderboard presentation are enabled for the campaign.
Use the ranking view for operational review while keeping judging or official event tabulation in its separate process.

Rankings describe campaign activity and verified results where supported. They do not by themselves determine judge scores, official tabulation, or the final outcome of a pageant.

Screenshot / Product in Action

Recommended asset: pageantxero-hero-rankings.webp

Source specification: 1600 × 1000 px, 16:10, sanitized demo data, WebP preferred or PNG for UI fidelity. Do not bake device frames, rounded corners, glow, shadows, or purple backgrounds into the source image.

Informative alt-text guidance: “Sanitized PageantXero organizer rankings view showing candidate standing, verified vote totals, campaign context, and visibility status.”

Suggested screenshot focus:

Organization, event, and campaign context
Candidate standing and rank labels
Verified vote totals or projections where enabled
Last activity or timestamp context
Public visibility state

FAQ

"Questions

"Find

No. Online voting is one part of the product. PageantXero connects organization setup, event management, candidate visibility, campaigns, public experiences, payment verification, and rankings so teams can manage the lifecycle around a pageant.

The workflow starts with an organization, then an event, candidates, campaigns, public candidate experiences, voting or engagement, verification, and rankings or results. Teams can prepare these pieces before launching a live campaign.

Yes. The approved MVP allows an event to have one or more voting campaigns. Campaign configuration and launch remain separate from the event record.

No. Publishing an event makes the event available according to its configured visibility, but it does not automatically launch a voting campaign. Event publication and campaign activation are separate lifecycle decisions.

See PageantXero in action.

Explore a more connected way to plan, promote, and run your next event.

Contact PageantXero